08th May2010

Urban Ecotones Published in Future Arquitecturas

by Jason King

The publication last year of Future Arquitecturas 19/20 Double Issue from 2009 featured the winners and selected projects from the Re-Invent Infrastructures Competition.  Urban Ecotones, the competition entry by Jason King (Principal of TERRA.fluxus) and Brett Milligan for the Metro Integrating Habitats competition, was a perfect fit for the competition (check out a brief of the Reinvent Infrastructures Competition here).  The project had previously been published in Metropolis and Landscape Architecture China – so the publication in another international Journal was a welcome addition.

Future Arquitecturas is published out of Madrid, so the issue is old news – but due to global snail mail – it took a bit of time for my copy of the publication to arrive (last week).  Brett and I submitted this as a project that fit many of the competition ideas including mobility, resource supply, waste, as ‘Hybrid Habitats’ acting as interrelated components of urban infrastructural systems.

A brief explanation of the project goals that were including in the text:

“Urban Ecotones” provides a contemporary vision for how modular economic development can regenerate, rather than destroy natural systems within an expanding city region.  Rather than seeing the thresholds at which commercial development meets natural systems as points of confrontation, they are approached as environments of unique richness – a synergy of diverse habitats akin to ecotones, spanning nested scales from site to region.  Urban ecotones are spaces for creative cross-programming that facilitate new regenerative urban processes, including: Parking (re)volution, Flow (re)direction and Waste (re)cycle.”

All images are courtesy of Future Arquitecturas Issue 19/20.   Project graphics and text copyright Jason King & Brett Milligan.

07th May2010

Real Good Food

by Jason King

An on-going project with Urban Development Partners NW (UD+P)  is a food cart hub located at 43rd & Belmont (read more about food carts here).  TERRA.fluxus has been working with UD+P to develop this interim use for the currently vacant lot in Southeast Portland as a multi-cart hub with associated amenities such as seating, tents, restrooms, landscaping, storage, and other site elements.  The site is located on an existing parking lot that has not been used for some time – adjacent to this commercial and mixed-use neighborhood.

A few close-ups of the existing site.

The site plan shows the relationship of elements, including the potential for approximately twenty carts.  Routing of water, electrical, and sewer was included to minimize conflicts with site users.  The site also benefits from a number of adjacent parking stalls.

To show the relationship, TERRA.fluxus created a simple SketchUp model to give a feel for the spaces. A birdseye perspective shows the entire site.

The following vignettes show a number of the site elements.

VIEW FROM BELMONT STREET

CENTRAL SEATING AREA

CENTRAL SEATING AREA W/ SHADE TENT

PATHWAY FROM PARKING AREA AND GARDEN SEATING

Finally, watch a video ‘walk-through’ of the site model to get a feel for the spaces.

Real Good Food from Jason King on Vimeo.
06th May2010

Jason King featured on LANDCAST

by Jason King
Bernard Tschumi, Downsview Park patterning illustration – image via Animal Architecture

Victoria, British Columbia-based Landscape Architect and blogger Christian Barnard was kind enough to include TERRA.fluxus Principal Jason King on episode #2 of his new series LANDCAST – a podcast format addressing ”the voice of contemporary landscape culture”.   The discussion was light and fun, and topics ranged from the origins of the firm name from James Corners seminal essay, to social media and landscape architecture, a dream tour of sustainable Portland sites, and the local food cart phenomenon – to name a few highlights.  Thanks Christian… it was a blast.

Hear the entire podcast here.

10th Mar2010

On Food Carts: Urban Gastronomic Revolution

by Jason King

The gastronomical heritage of Portland is well known, with strong cult followings in beer, wine, coffee, spirits, urban agriculture, and local/organic food.  The choice of restaurants, farmer’s markets, community gardens, coffeehouses, brewpubs, and dive bars offers anything, literally, on the menu.  While always a fixture of urban life, street food is definitely becoming a more common way of delivering food to urban residents.  A rapidly expanding subset of this genre is the explosion of food carts – those mobile, self-contained, and thriving locally.

screenshot of Food Cart Portland website

One major resource in the search for the ultimate cart is the site Food Carts Portland, operated by the pseudonymous Dieselboi and Cuisine Bonne Femme – who offer reviews and other resources for the cart-based culinary revolution.  They also offer an ode to the cart in a short essay ‘Portland Hearts Food Carts’, which I’ve reprinted from their site here in full:

“Portland has a proliferation of Food Carts and they seem to be growing in numbers and locations. Some might call them lunch wagons, taco trucks or even snack shacks, but whatever you call them, they are truly a phenomenon in Portland. Set up in parking lots, sidewalks, and even parks (sometimes in large groups and sometimes solo), one might nosh on a fresh tortilla Baja fish taco one day, a rib-sticking bowl of traditional goulash the next, have a coffee and pastry for an afternoon snack, and then take home a giant Indian combo box for dinner.

Locals from various places and committed food-loving tourists from all over know that some of the best food to be had in any city from Bangkok to Baja is to be had at small street stands, carts, and other non-restaurant restaurants. New York City, for example, a city with some great street food, holds the annual “Vendy Awards” to express their love for mobile dining. There is even a website dedicated to street food around the world, although oddly, no U.S. cities are represented. In fact, many cities in the U.S. strictly limit or outlaw food carts completely, making Portland more akin to cities in Europe than in the U.S.

Food carts are also about supporting small, locally-owned businesses and small start-ups that might not have the capital or credit to open up their own full-fledged restaurants. That said, food carts are not restaurants! With limited hours, lack of indoor (and sometimes lack of any) seating, and small menus, they complement rather than compete with full-scale restaurants. Food carts help create a vibrant downtown and central city by bringing what planning geeks call a “social fabric on the street” which is great in cultural terms, but in economic terms also attracts other spenders, retail outlets, and restaurants and cafes. Food carts also often illustrate the delicious benefits to a growing ethnically diverse community, as many immigrants own and operate them and make and serve some pretty tasty ethnic specialties.

Plus, food carts can be a fantastic bargain for office workers, students, budget travelers, and anyone looking for a cheap, quick, but delicious bargain lunch.

Regardless, food carts are part of the culinary fabric of our wonderful city and dining in Portland wouldn’t be the same without them.”

A quick glance at the site (or any aggregation of two or more carts) will yield a range of ethnic, specialty & regional variations, and a range types of cuisine.  There is definitely a preponderance of Mexican and Thai represented (sometimes side-by-side), but it is easy to name a type of food and then likely match this to a cart or two.  We have legendary carts, unique carts, even carts owned by rock stars (in this case, former Shins drummer Jesse Sandoval’s Neuvo Mexico) and a Portland v. NYC street food/feud.  This is often the beauty, as the capital expenditure and life expectancy for a restaurant specializing in, say, regional Bavarian cuisine may be a tough go.  But, for a few thousand bucks, a cart can be up and running with minimal overhead.

SW 5th Cart Hub - image via California Planning & Development Report

The FCP site is a great resource, and links to a very simple and helpful map via designer Audrey Eschright, showing locations of many area carts.  Not sure the vintage of the info (there’s a few missing that I know of) but it seems reasonably up to date (also allowing folks to add and edit sites – which is key as there is a quick ebb and flow of carts moving – some purposely, on a moments notice).  The map links back to the FCP site for more info, reviews, menus, etc.  It’s in google maps – so it exports well into Google Earth for a bit more usability (GIS would be even better, so stay tuned).

I fiddled with the symbology a bit and located the carts with smaller yellow markers.  Concentrations of carts on a single site (aka Cart Hubs) have a larger orange marker.  You can see the density of these locations (specifically downtown and inner SE), and also the locations along typically commercial corridors.

A single cart is more than likely the sign of an opportunistic intervention (or a brave pioneer) in an under-served portion of the community.  These pepper the landscape throughout the City, and probably number in the 100′s city-wide, spreading from the core out to more remote locations.  The more concentrated Cart Hubs are a somewhat more recent and interesting phenomena that takes advantage of economy of scale and grouping to make a destination with a variety of choices.  These are typically located on the perimeter edge of a surface parking lot, where folks pay ‘rent’ in terms of monthly parking fees, plus the cost of a vendor license + regular health inspections.

There are four of these ‘hubs’ in Downtown, and a few more emerging across the river to the east.  The older downtown pockets have been around for a while serving downtown office workers, including a grouping in Pioneer Courthouse Square, a some other groupings throughout the inner city (some have been displaced through redevelopment of surface lots) .

A few popular locales in the Downtown core worth of attention:

SW Fifth, between Oak & Stark (along the Transit Mall)

SW Ninth+Tenth, between Washington & Alder

SW Fourth, between College and Hall (near Portland State)

The common denominator (aside from occupation of parking) is a heavy concentration of diners, typically serving during lunch hours.  Thus proximity to office workers and students (i.e. daytime denizens) seems like a recipe for success – particular for these masses of carts.  Many of these carts are only open during lunch for a couple of hours, while some have begun to stay open later to take on the dinner and even late-night crowds in specific areas.  One aspect worth looking at is the inherent competition (or maybe synergy) between bricks-and-mortar retail restaurants and the wheeled mobile varieties, as they seem able to co-exist within similar space.

That is not to say there isn’t some conflict, particularly a well publicized feud from 2002, that pitted a well-known local restaurant owner against food carts – citing specifically different rules governing carts versus restaurants unfairly tipping the competition.  Most folks laughed.  While both provide food – the draw is totally different and satisfies very different aspects of dining experience people look for.

One Eastside example, on 12th & Hawthorne in Southeast. is a slightly different breed.  On the corner of 12th and Hawthorne, this emerging ‘hub’ is located along a commercial strip, and located in a tough development corner adjacent to residential areas.  This merging point of residential and commercial seems to be a key locator to broaden the range of possible customers – in this case occupying a hole where there aren’t many food options.  The organic evolution of the site over time is interesting – and also representative of the neighborhood zeitgeist of Southeast Portland.

12th + Hawthorne Hub @ Night - image via Flickr / cafemama

A similar organically evolving site in a vacant lot is dubbed ‘Area 23′ on Alberta – and I’m sure a few more that will spring up literally overnight.  The new hybrid model of this type of development is the Food Hub at North Mississippi, which is one of the first to be developed specifically for food carts.  Via OregonLive“Business man Roger Goldingay spent months (not to mention $900,000 in real-estate costs) to shape a new vision for North Portland: converting a dilapidated building and an abandoned lot into a food-cart center, a community gathering place and an incubator for small artisan businesses focused on food or crafts.”

Prost on Mississippi , with the carts to the left - image via PDX Eater

The project switch, even though the site is located in an emerging neighborhood, was driven by the fact that the economic slowdown caused the site development of new mixed use buildings to stall – making an interim use for the site necessary.  The level of investment makes sense for these ephemeral uses, but perhaps it’s something a bit more long-lasting – offering a type of experience that is common around the world with vibrant street food identities.  The locations may change, but the variety of food will continually expand and evolve, and create another possible use for the various vacant lots around town – perhaps even coupling this with the urban agriculture movements for growing food, wine grapes, or hops for local beer or other consumables in the city.

A potential for a true urban gastronomic revolution.

[For an upcoming project, I'm doing some research on the evolutionary and urban design phenomenon around these locations and groupings of Food Carts in Portland.  A series of posts will outline this process, so check back for more updates as the project progresses.]

10th Mar2010

Cultivating the Shrinking City

by Jason King

There has been a ton of press recently on the proposals for demolition and transformation of Detroit vacant lands for large-scale urban agriculture.  Articles by Fast Company, The New Republic, Associated Press, The Detroit Free Press and countless other blogs have discussed ideas related to consolidation of urban density and re-purposing this Terrain Vague not just for gardens, but for true large scale urban farming.  As part of the team that visited Detroit as part of the AIA Sustainable Design Assessment Team in 2008, I witnessed first-hand some of the conditions that are being discussed – and along with the team offered many of the seeds of change that are beginning to emerge and flourish.

The product of this work is Leaner, Greener, Detroit | A Report by the American Institute of Architects Sustainable Design Assessment Team; authored by Alan Mallach, Subrata Basu, Stephen Gazillo, Jason King, Teresa Lynch, Edwin Marty & Colin Meehan and edited by our AIA handlers Marcia Garcia & Erin Simmons,  (October 2008)   [link to the full report here]

The problem at the time was pretty clear – and folks were beginning to acknowledge the fact that Detroit would never again be a city of two- million inhabitants, and that this would have implications on any approach to combating the phenomenon of shrinking.  From the executive summary on Sustainable Urban Form:

“Detroit has far more land than it needs to accommodate its people. Detroit must begin to look at ways to reconfigure its land uses to create smaller, better functioning, more sustainable and interconnected livable communities. A new compact development pattern based on an urban core and a network of urban villages linked by roads and transitways will not only allow for more efficient and cost effective delivery of public services, but will encourage public transportation, provide opportunities for diverse, mixed income communities, and create long term environmental benefit by reducing vehicle use and fostering transit and land use efficiency.”

The most telling diagram of the size of the problem was the brainchild of Dan Pitera, a local architect and  professor of architecture at University of Detroit Mercy.  His diagram below shows an indication of the immensity of the problem by comparing the density and size of Detroit with some other populations and sizes of significant US Cities.  I was flummoxed by this map as it really struck a chord in the difficulties inherent in providing services to this large area with a relatively dispersed population.  [As a side note, I was also similarly amazed when I did a similar study of Portland and found that we are much more similar to Detroit in size and density - which has continued to shock local folks that see our fair city as the model for contained and dense urban growth]

The result was a conceptual diagram that took existing pockets of relative density and aimed to consolidate urban vitality where it was currently strongest.  While purposely generic (and for full disclosure, done with the rudimentary stone tools of Microsoft Powerpoint on the fly), this proposal was based on an analysis using local information on specific ‘centers’ that currently existed.  From the report:  “The recommended urban form consists of an urban core, which includes downtown Detroit and contiguous areas such as Mexicantown, Midtown and New Center, linked to a network of urban villages through public transit, greenways, blueways and bikeways, with future opportunity areas created through land banking distributed around the urban villages.”

diagram by Jason king

As I wrote on Landscape+Urbanism, the hierarchy of urban form includes these urban villages, along with connected layers of greenway corridors and ample ‘opportunity areas’.  “From a more physical point of view, the fact that the population of this ‘new Detroit’ could fit within 50 square miles – leaving 80-90 square miles of ‘opportunity area’ that could consist of greenways, parkways, and urban agriculture – along with urban reserves. This leaves areas of density – core and urban villages – intertwined with the new fabric of community that is regenerative.”

While it was implicit in the reference to opportunity that these could be malleable (i.e. support green space, agriculture, or new development – if necessary), it was still met with some vocal skepticism.  It is amazing to see the turn-around from the relative shock-and-awe when we presented these ideas in Detroit in 2008.  It’s a radical solution that involves both winners and losers (when thought of in terms of specific property) and that rankled (and maybe intrigued) more than a few people. As mentioned in the report, these seeds were essential to the proposals for opportunity areas:

“Detroit is particularly well suited to become a pioneer in commercial urban agriculture. The city already has hundreds of community gardens, and a growing number of small commercial agricultural operations. The operators of these farms and gardens have organized networks to support and promote their activities. The Eastern Market and the surrounding complimentary businesses give Detroit a food-related infrastructure well beyond that which exists in most cities.  The benefits of urban agriculture can be realized by an initiative designed to lead to large-scale agricultural production in Detroit, using a significant share of the city’s vacant land over the next five to ten years. 10,000 acres of land used for urban agriculture – less than half of the city’s vacant land – could support hundreds of farms and generate thousands of jobs, while dramatically improving the health of Detroit’s residents. Within five years, Detroit should be able to build an urban agriculture system that would substantially exceed any other system in the United States.”

The beauty of this type of intervention is that it isn’t a permanent solution but offers a measure of flexibility moving into the future.  Rather than leave lands within the city fallow until the best use is obtained, this proposal maximizes the overall use for as long as it is viable economically, and also includes ideas of job creation, reduction of blight, increased safety, and access to local food.  While maintaining this productivity, it is also rather easy to transform these zones into other uses, were population to grow and require development.  Call it productive land banking.

While none of the ideas we presented were new, they were based on solid precedents and made a lot of sense as a response to the context we were facing.  Although many now are staking claim to the ‘brilliant idea’ of large scale farming and reconfiguration of vacant lands in Detroit, there was already plenty of talk about these ideas from local residents on our visit and folks were planning visions of major changes to come.  The difference is that talk has turned to action (and political will, which in Detroit means everything), with proposals such as Hantz Farms to cultivate large scale areas of the city.

Detroit has stuck with me since Angels’ Night 2008, and is a telling counterpoint to many of the issues facing Portland.  The regional variation and issues tied to economics and location are indicative of trends in looking at and applying the unique strategic opportunities based on landscape urbanism principles.  Read more on the process and thinking in this series of posts from Landscape+Urbanism:

:: The Detroit Dilemma (Nov 8, 2008)
:: The Detroit Dilemma – Ruminations (Dec 26, 2008)
:: Delirious Detroit: Land of UnReal Estate (Mar 27, 2009)
:: Speaking Dequindre (May 16, 2009)
:: Peril of the Forgotten (May 31, 2009)
:: Detroit: Urbanist Opportunity (Jun 13, 2009)
:: The Incredible Shrinking City (June 17, 2009)
:: Growing the Shrinking City (June 25, 2009)
:: Some SDATisfaction (July 5, 2009)
:: Garden City Detroit (July 28, 2009)
:: Detroit Vacancy (August 17, 2009)

20th Feb2010

Open for Business

by Jason King

It’s been a bit of time in the making, but TERRA.fluxus LLC is now officially open for business.


A bit of background can be gleaned through the website, including some of the seeds of the firm’s philosophy (with thanks to prominent landscape urbanists), some background of Principal Jason A. King, a range of past and recent writings, speculative projects, and teaching.  Also, included, with upcoming expansion, is a simple portfolio of a range of project work.

Through my 14 years of experience, I’ve had the opportunity to work on a diverse range of projects personally, which will be showcased in addition to new work under the name of the new firm.  I’ve also had the great opportunity to learn from and work with local Portland firms GreenWorks PC and Macdonald Environmental Planning, so I thank both of these offices for the opportunity and ability to share some of this work.  I want to personally give credit where it is due with these firms and the great work they are doing, while also showing off some selected projects in which I was integrally involved as project manager and lead designer.

This blog is going to act as the placeholder as I work on a more refined website – so stay tuned for more info, and drop a line to say hello.

18th Jan2010

Oregon Solutions takes on Community Gardening

by Jason King

We are in the process of wrapping up the Oregon Solutions project related to Portland Community Gardens.  As part of this multi-stakeholder process, I’m currently chairing the Demand working group, where we are mapping community gardens and urban agriculture resources, along with outlining the larger picture of garden supply and demand throughout the community.  A summary of the process goals:

“The goal of this project is to to increase community gardening opportunities in the city, thereby better meeting the recent increase in demand for community gardens, while capturing the current public attention on environmental and community sustainability, food security, and public health.”

Part of the process of working with the group is determining the range of the bigger picture of the realm of urban agriculture – locating community gardens as a part of the local and regional structure for access to growing food locally.  This graphic was an attempt to visualize these interrelationships:

Also, stay tuned for some excerpts of the mapping project, which will provide a baseline for identification of resources related to community gardening, and guide existing and future development of community gardens.

Pages:«123